Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medvertex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.

Medvertex (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The source are Medvertex itself, a google search for the subject's name, a database entry from the Arizona Corporation Commission, Medvertex itself and Medvertex itself again. Oh, I almost forgot, Wikipedia itself. None of these are the kind of sources that can sustain an article. Fails WP:NCORP. Vexations (talk) 00:50, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete per WP:A7, article on a corporation that fails to indicate notability. Nanophosis (talk) 01:04, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, CSD would be fine if the creator, whose name suggest that they may have a connection to the subject hadn't protested and claimed that all the content is factual. They're likely to protest that there is a credible indication of the importance or significance of the subject that would make A7 not applicable. I apologize for creating more unnecessary work for the community. Vexations (talk) 01:14, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No need to apologize, it's not your fault regardless. Anyway, Delete and SALT because the article has been recreated about 5 times now and this needs to stop. Nanophosis (talk) 03:16, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:55, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:55, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Concur with nom. Does not meet WP:NCORP MB 05:44, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Doesn't meet WP:NCORP. Enjoyed the ref tag to another wikipedia page, though, and for the mascot blurb. If this is its fifth recreation, happy to salt. SportingFlyer talk 06:01, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No evidence of notability, and rather promotional too. The king of the sun (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:34, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails the gng. ^{cinco de} L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 23:02, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails GNG and WP:NCORP. I rolled back the blanking of the article. HighKing⁺⁺ 18:22, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Nothing better than mundane sources provided or found regarding this company. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 09:22, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.