Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meghan Walsh (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:07, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Meghan Walsh

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted at AfD, the article was created again today. It contains one (local) source that provides significant coverage of the subject. I've been unable to find any additional independent sources. Not notable as a singer/songwriter or as a journalist. Schazjmd (talk) 00:37, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, and Ohio. Shellwood (talk) 00:40, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Being a reporter for six major local newspapers, covering state politics and the war in Ukraine is not notable? Venusrising16 (talk) 00:55, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I find many thing she's written, but nothing about her as a person. Some local coverage about her singing/releasing a single, which just about anyone can do online these days. Nothing notable. Oaktree b (talk) 03:46, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing found notable. fails WP:GNG. DMySon (talk) 14:18, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTRESUME, plus WP:NJOURNALIST which says that simply being a journalist with publications is not sufficient. Instead, there must be reliable articles about said journalist as prominent in that field. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:31, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete we need something more than press releases from her employers to show that she is notable. In general reporters for local newspapers are not, on the whole notable. Only a select few journalists are actual notable for journalism per se, a lot more move on to becoming notable writers. Yes, there are also people notable for being journalists, but they are far outnumbered by the news reporters who are not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:24, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree this fails WP:GNG Chronotime (talk) 20:02, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:JOURNALIST and WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 23:25, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:JOURNALIST. Best, GPL93 (talk) 18:06, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.