Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Member of technical staff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No consensus on recreating this on Wiktionary. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:37, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Member of technical staff

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not finding significant coverage of this term itself, just mentions of people who are such staff members and passing mentions, such as in this source. Does not meet WP:GNG. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:41, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:42, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:42, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:47, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - essentially a neologism or definition of a title. No substance, no real sources. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 04:48, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Wiktionary a redirect to Bell Labs isn't quite appropriate, as the term has expanded from its initial use there . The article is a dictdef of a job title, and will almost certainly stay as one. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:39, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.