Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mercy Heights

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The term is not even mentioned in the possible redirect target 2000 AD (comics), so it doesn't make sense to redrect there. – sgeureka ^t•c 08:13, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mercy Heights

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not every comic strip is notable. What makes this one? I can't find any reliable analysis, reviews, etc. Few mentions in passing on blogs and like. Not sufficient in light of GNG/Wikipedia:Notability (media). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 15:53, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 15:53, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 15:53, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 15:53, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Redirect to 2000 AD (comics) - While I concur with the nomination that this comic fails the WP:GNG due to the lack of coverage is reliable, secondary sources, it could be useful as search term to redirect to the anthology it appeared in. Though, I'm a bit iffy on that, considering that there appear to be a number of real-life places actually called Mercy Heights, so I would also be fine with straight Deletion if consensus is leaning that way. Rorshacma (talk) 16:50, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I can find one source: 2000 AD: The Creator Interviews - Volume 05. Toughpigs (talk) 17:54, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It has sat there all but unnoticed since 2006. Seems a shame, but the complete lack of RS, and no evidence of notability means this fails GNG. — Sirfurboy (talk) 10:02, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.