Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Brian Wheeler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Philip Bloom (businessman). Consensus is that its own page isn't merited. As an alternative to deletion, I've redirected it to another article where his role is mentioned. Perhaps the whole affair could get mentioned somewhere like Coalition_Provisional_Authority#Criticism_of_financial_management all have all the individual articles point there. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 21:20, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Brian Wheeler

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While his case achieved some notability, it's unclear that he's notable enough beyond this one event. It does not appear to have broad enough impact for the crime to be notable either StarM 19:27, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. StarM 19:27, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions. StarM 19:27, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. StarM 19:27, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The coverage of his activities is not enough to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:06, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Run-of-the-mill reservist who became a run-of-the-mill criminal. Nothing noteworthy here. BD2412 T 21:08, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I prodded this article last month for much the same reasons. Robert Stein Jr. and Philip Bloom (businessman) are related to the same case and should be reviewed also - Dumelow (talk) 10:09, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep WP:SIGCOV - coverage was in more than one newspaper of record over several years. Bearian (talk) 22:04, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - had a look for sources but didn't find anything Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 17:46, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.