Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Craig (judge)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 18:09, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Craig (judge)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see anything in WP:BIO about state district judges being inherently notable. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 04:57, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.

Ascii002Talk Contribs 05:26, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.

Ascii002Talk Contribs 05:27, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:08, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010 • (talk) 18:18, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 07:35, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't believe state judges are automatically notable and I don't see coverage sufficient to meet GNG. 131.118.229.17 (talk) 01:35, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Judges at his level are not notable enough. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:16, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:16, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Also: he fails my standards for judges, and the sourcing stinks. Bearian (talk) 17:43, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.