Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael D. Metelits

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:06, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Michael D. Metelits (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:POLOUTCOMES, Ambassadors are not considered presumptively notable. No evidence of notability for this person. PK-WIKI (talk) 19:58, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Bilateral relations, Angola, Brazil, and California. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:00, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Unfortunately, this topic does not seem notable. Handmeanotherbagofthemchips (talk) 13:30, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Ambassadors are not inherently/automatically notable. Gnews comes up with a namesake (could be him) of a son of a woman who collected a lot of videos. Hardly a claim for notability. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 23:37, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.