Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Youssef (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WP:SNOW keep. I'm withdrawing my nomination. Jayjg ^(talk) 17:23, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Youssef

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC. Sources are either unreliable, or not in depth. Jayjg ^(talk) 14:47, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Jayjg ^(talk) 14:47, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Jayjg ^(talk) 14:47, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Jayjg ^(talk) 14:47, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:10, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:11, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:11, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:12, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep--sources #3, #4, and #5 are independent, reliable, and enough in depth to count for notability. However, the video on one of them doesn't work because it is archived, making it hard to assess. I found two other independent, in-depth enough sources here and here.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 01:29, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - An author of 35 books is likely to be notable. However I would be happier if his church were notable enough to have an article. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:55, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Church of the Apostles (Atlanta).E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:54, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as he does seem to pass WP:NAUTHOR as significant in his field for example worldcat shows 2400 library holdings of his works which is a strong indicator of notability suggesting they would be widely reviewed Atlantic306 (talk) 20:13, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- it looks passes WP:NAUTHOR--MA Javadi (talk) 19:41, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep lots of coverage comes up in news archive searches - going back decades. Note that he is foounder and pastor of a large, prominent Church of the Apostles (Atlanta).E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:52, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep references 4 and 5 is considering as reliable sources.Fatzaof (talk) 13:42, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.