Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Tempest

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 07:09, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Michelle Tempest

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In terms of this subject's notability, there's a single source that is a book review.

(Page creator has a history of creating articles later speedy-deleted due to vanity and promotion.) Holdek (talk) 23:33, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Zero evidence of notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:59, 26 July 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Both the tagged editor (here) and her book The Future of the NHS appear to fail WP:GNG. The book she edited is from a specialist law publisher, publishing books for practitioners. The sole cited source is a related source, being a publication of the institution where she teaches (more in the way of a press release). No in depth coverage of Michelle Tempest was found, in any type of source, and none in independent reliable sources. Her publication "Ethics in public relations practice an analysis of the ethical dilemmas inherent in public relations practice and a consideration of the effectiveness of the industry's codes of conduct." (1994) has not been cited, at least as per GoogleScholar. (I do not have access to Social Science Citation Index.) She also fails WP:ACADEMIC. --Bejnar (talk) 16:12, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.