Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mickey Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:07, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mickey Singh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The one source in the article is the extent of the available coverage for the subject, the rest is all social media. Fails WP:MUSICBIO. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 01:54, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete- all primary sources or social media. Fails WP:GNG, WP:MUSIC and WP:BIO. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:39, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Would YouTube videos be considered a primary source or social media? Hsking24 (talk) 06:44, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If the video or social media was created by the subject himself, yes. Sometimes videos may not be reliable, significant or in-depth, YouTube may be used with some cases and less so with social media as it may not be accurate. SwisterTwister talk 17:55, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarification, primary sources have been deleted and more secondary sources have been added. I will continue to update the page day by day. Let me know if there's anything that stands out that needs to be fixed. Thank you Hsking24 (talk) 22:13, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this article should be removed from articles of deletion because it has enough credentials and secondary sources to support it. Hsking24 (talk) 19:28, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Davewild (talk) 06:49, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - meets WP:GNG per coverage —Мандичка^YO 😜 07:36, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.