Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Micks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:16, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Micks

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Self-sourced vanity page. I've cleaned it up quite a bit, removing spamlinks etc, but probably just another wannabee Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:28, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 08:33, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 08:33, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 08:33, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Subject does not meet GNG or WP:Music. It is a promo piece written by an "official" editor. While no longer purely G11, now, it remains promotional. promo puff piece for subject not meeting GNG .Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:28, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not seeing coverage to meet GNG. GoldenRing (talk) 00:45, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.