Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microsoft Regional Director (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 19:43, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Microsoft Regional Director

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't verify its WP:NOTABILITY. Last AfD only had 2 participants and was closed as no consensus. I'm hoping we can now develop a consensus; it has been tagged for notability for 7 years. Sending WP:APPNOTE to Iunaw, KvnG, Msnicki, Boleyn (talk) 19:35, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Same reasons I offered in nominating this page to AfD last time. The sources to support notability under WP:GNG simply do not exist. Msnicki (talk) 20:46, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete 20 years ago, Microsoft led the way and programs like this might have been of notable interest. These days though, it's all too reactionary, too inward looking. Those working in the field outside Microsoft take little interest in what's happening within there. It's possible that this is notable, should independent attention be being given to it, but that is (IMHO) increasingly less likely. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:27, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.