Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Middle Finger Protests

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:49, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Middle Finger Protests (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Finger Protests Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable organization that clearly fails WP:ORGDEPTH, and only one particular editor has so far edited this article so far and he also happens to be the creator. I have also nominated the article of its non-notable founder (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prabhloch Singh (2nd nomination)), who's article was also created by the same editor. Capitals00 (talk) 05:51, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Non notable - insubstantial RS. Deathlibrarian (talk) 07:15, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:17, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:17, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:17, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Clearly notable. There is enough in depth coverage and the org has been behind some of the very important cases in india. Has credible and reliable sources. ThisMr (talk) 13:26, 6 February 2018 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: ThisMr (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD. [reply]

Above user is the creator of the article and has been canvassing to this AFD.[1] Anmolbhat (talk) 15:33, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - it is a little difficult to see the notability because there are some sources that are marginal, primary (based on press releases) or not actually about the organisation, but I believe the coverage is sufficient for ORGDEPTH. --bonadea contributions talk 13:40, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is not difficult at all and there are no sources to establish any notability. Anmolbhat (talk) 15:33, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There are enough sources to establish notability only if you take into account the citations/references.ThisMr (talk) 20:18, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as promotional article failing WP:ORG. Anmolbhat (talk) 15:33, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non notable organization as does not have any significant coverage other than primary sources. Fails WP:ORGDEPTH --Hagennos ❯❯❯ Talk 20:53, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as fails WP:ORGDEPTH and promotional. MT Train^Discuss 05:11, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non-notable organization and the author appears to have a close connection with the subject. GSS (talk|c|em) 09:41, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Could you shed some light on the close connection? It will be really enlightening for the community.ThisMr (talk) 17:14, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.