Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midreshet Yeud

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 06:46, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Midreshet Yeud

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This program does not appear to meet general notability guidelines. It is possible that sources may exist in another language, so I am bringing this to the AfD noticeboard rather than proposing deletion for higher visibility. Please leave me a message on my talk page should appropriate sourcing be located. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:26, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:35, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:39, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Could be more out there in Hebrew, but I'm not seeing significant, in-depth, reliable, third-party coverage .... Neutrality^talk 16:06, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 02:18, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:35, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Doesn't meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG that we can see (and can be re-created at a later date if someone can verify its notability). Boleyn (talk) 08:02, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I'd of preferred to Keep in the hope it could be expanded, Problem is I can't find naff all myself so not entirely sure anyone else can either, Plus I'm not all that convinced it'll ever be expanded beyond what it is now, So unfortunately with that in my mind and the fact it fails GNG I'll have to say Delete. –Davey2010^Talk 14:57, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.