Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mightylite
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:14, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Mightylite
- Mightylite (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No claim of importance, no references. Quite hard to look for sources as there seems to be a lot of products with the same name. The original article was a bit more informative about who is involved in making this, but that information was lost in a cleanup of promotional text. It could possibly be this product but note the variant spelling on the product and the Pelican brand is not mentioned in our article so who knows. Also note that although the book starts off using the Mightylite spelling (same as our article), it changes halfway through to Mitylite matching the spelling on the product shown in the book. I am far from convinced it is the same product, but it might be, but even if it is, one souce is not enough to establish notability. SpinningSpark 17:22, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 02:06, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Human3015 It will rain 03:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Human3015 It will rain 03:58, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Delte per nomination. No references or information to support that this gadget merits a stand alone page. Blue Riband► 22:54, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as mentioned, could be a conceivable article but still questionable at best. WP:TNT, SwisterTwister talk 05:51, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.