Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Migra Studium Foundation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 15:35, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Migra Studium Foundation

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG The Banner talk 16:34, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - strictly speaking the tougher WP:NCORP standards should be used as an organisation. After filtering out the multiple sources with no deep link/dead link, the sources either lacked intellectual independence, or had no Sig Cov on the organisation itself. Usually no more than 6/7 lines. There were two sources that covered the foundation's attack on interned minors, but this was both a specific foundation action, and more in the form of a phrased press release rather than anything else. I haven't yet done my own BEFORE check on sources elsewhere, so I won't cast my !vote yet. Nosebagbear (talk) 16:50, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 16:54, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 16:54, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 16:54, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I'm skeptical of English Wikipedia entries based primarily on other language sources that don't have articles in those Wikipedias (Spanish or Catalan Wikipedias in this case) . Perhaps that's not strict WP: something or another all caps labeled policy, but it for sure influences my opinion about the notability of topics. - Scarpy (talk) 20:08, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
DElete -- This appears to be a one-location ministry, which is probably no more significant than a local church, which we routinely delete or merge to its place. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:50, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete-I don't claim to have access to Spanish-sources but when Peterkingiron says to delete, I will toe the line.....∯WBG^converse 11:55, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.