Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike plotnikoff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:37, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mike plotnikoff

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable person. No WP:Reliable sources. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 00:56, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete. Digging around on Google got nothing more extensive than this or this. Not the sort of coverage a Wikipedia article needs. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 01:26, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

comment. If the d vision is to keep the article, please move the title so Plotnikoff is properly capitalized. Postcard Cathy (talk) 08:29, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Leaning towards delete and maybe mention him whatever article is appropriate because there doesn't seem to be good sources and my searches found several results here, here and here but not much significant coverage. SwisterTwister talk 18:24, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 (Talk) 14:59, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 (Talk) 15:07, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.