Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milestone Systems

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:10, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Milestone Systems

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Entirely self-sourced (own site, and press releases). I tried to find some reliable, independent sources online to no avail. As notability is not inherited, I don't see how this subsidiary meets the requirement for corporate notability. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 21:36, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I was tending towards G11 speedy deletion as spam. Even if sources could be found, writing a new article would be less work than trying to clean up this one. Huon (talk) 21:40, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:24, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:24, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:24, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It is possible to source this to GNG with e.g. this, this, this, this, this and some of the many articles in Børsen that mention the company.
In this case, however, I doubt I will ... have time to fit rewriting and sourcing into my editing schedule. The article was started in 2006 as an undeniable promo piece by a user whose name happens to be identical to one of the founders of the company. Paid/COI/SPA editors should know that volunteer editors not necessarily are here to rewrite their "articles". Sam Sailor 09:37, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.