Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Millennium Management

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:34, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Millennium Management (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

taken from Special:AncientPages. Was last edited in 2005. Seems to serve no purpose. Coin945 (talk) 12:20, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. I think this was intended to be a disambiguation list. If you go to article Millennium Management (disambiguation), it redirects to this article. However, only the first company in the list has an article. Do we keep disambiguation lists in such cases?--Larry (talk) 16:38, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:44, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep ... now that I've trimmed/expanded it to a dab page with two valid entries. PamD 12:50, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep 2nd entry meets MOS:DABMENTION. Boleyn (talk) 14:16, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:30, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per above. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 22:34, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.