Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mindteck (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. qedk (t 桜 c) 06:11, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mindteck

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Of the existing citations, the best seem to be this "buy" advice and this "sell" advice. A WP:BEFORE turned up nothing WP:RS discussing the company in detail. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:GNG. Narky Blert (talk) 18:18, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:27, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:27, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom; all of the non-duplicated Google web and news search results are merely passing mentions or non-qualifying trivial coverage. Nothing which meets our significant coverage standard in multiple qualifying reliable and independent sources to pass WP:GNG. So, before we even examine WP:CORPDEPTH, it fails WP:GNG. Doug Mehus T·C 20:00, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment; see also this RfD discussion. J 947 ^{^{^(c)}}, at 02:56, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There was another AfD where someone tried to say analyst reports about stock prices where valid sources for establishing notability. Personally, I disagree with that. At least not on their own. So, given that there seems to be nothing else reliable out there about them I'm going with delete as failing the GNG. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:34, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Purely promotional article. Dorama285 01:31, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.