Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mini Ladd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:18, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mini Ladd

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite his high number of YouTube subscribers, a search for coverage in reliable sources only results in brief mentions (these brief mentions being nothing more than name-checks). I couldn't find any coverage that was specifically about him. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:14, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:15, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:15, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:15, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:15, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Subject is only mentioned in passing in reliable sources. I found this but wouldn't in anyway deem it reliable or confirming Ladd's notability. Meatsgains (talk) 02:29, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Coverage on him specifically is simply insubstantial to merit an article. GAB^Hello! 17:11, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, not significant as a single subject. "Hey there! How's it goin'?" 15:01, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No depth of coverage in reliable independent sources, so does not pass WP:CREATIVE or WP:GNG. Drchriswilliams (talk) 19:04, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.