Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minimum control speeds

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). The first keep !vote does not provide guideline or policy based rationale for retention. After two relistings, closing as no consensus with no prejudice against speedy renomination. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:28, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Minimum control speeds

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:OR and WP:NOTMANUAL. To see what I mean, read what was removed from the article here[1] when the PROD was taken down. ...William 13:53, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:40, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article simply needs a few more sources... I think it is a fairly well written article other than that EoRdE6 (talk) 02:43, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This article seems to be well-written and sourced, and covers one of the important distinguishing concepts common to most multiengine aircraft. The content here is exactly what I was expecting to find on wikipedia when I searched for this concept. -- Bovineone (talk) 02:27, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:56, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:56, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:40, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.