Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Turkey 2010

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:47, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Turkey 2010

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems to be the only Year specific page for Miss Turkey (since 1930's). Given it has no sources and the details of who won are already at Miss Turkey, it should be deleted entirely. Legacypac (talk) 02:21, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, although it's probably about to be CSD'd anyway. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 12:06, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe reduce the AfD list by one... Legacypac (talk) 12:08, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Source added which includes all winners information. Also, winner is already written in article. AlexandreManette (talk) 19:54, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In the Miss Turkey article? This is article is about a one day event, it should be and is covered as part of the larger topic at Miss Turkey Legacypac (talk) 20:16, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also the source does not support the ages, measurements or hometowns of the contestants and some other details on the page.Legacypac (talk) 14:13, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:57, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:57, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:15, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 20:37, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this is not of sufficient importance to merit its own article. Curro2 (talk) 16:15, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, due to verifiability concerns. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:50, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Yamaguchi先生 - Fails GNG. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 22:39, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.