Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mist Systems

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 06:09, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mist Systems

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not notable company. article created by initially undeclared paid editor. The references are pure PR and mere notices, which is what would be expected since they do not yet seem to have an significant market presences. DGG ( talk ) 00:14, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 00:23, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 00:23, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 00:23, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 00:23, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 00:23, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 00:23, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- corporate spam on a nn private company just going about its business. Sources are WP:SPIP and do not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Fails appropriate notability guidelines. Includes much trivia, such as:

"In July 2017, the company introduced a partner channel program to target service providers of cloud based wireless solutions.[12]"

Etc. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:59, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with nom and K.e.coffman above. Corporate spam, fails WP:SPIP, fails GNG, references fail the criteria for establishing notabilty WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺13:06, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.