Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mithun Ramesh (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:14, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mithun Ramesh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm repeating what I exactly said at my first AfD, "Questionably notable for WP:CREATIVE as there's nothing solid, aside from the claims of Guinness World Records, to suggest a solidly notable and acceptable article; the best my searches found was only this (News), this (browsers links) and this (WP:INDAFD) and none of it seems convincing enough.". SwisterTwister talk 05:39, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:39, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:39, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:39, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - All the coverage I find for this person is because he set longest radio music show record which shows that he's famous but not notable per WP:ONEEVENT. Other than that I can only find passing mentions across various news articles not enough to make him pass WP:NBIO—UY Scuti ^Talk 06:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The article fails WP:ONEEVENT and references are not available to state whether he's notable. JackTracker (talk) 20:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.