Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mixmasterz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Obvious speedy, self-promo for non-notable person Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:26, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mixmasterz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent sources. Does not satisfy general notability or musical notability.

Already speedy-deleted once. Let's let the community decide rather than CSD-war. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:48, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:42, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:43, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- malformed spam. Recommend salting as well. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:55, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - An recording made by an unnotable music artist.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 03:09, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.