Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mo Elleithee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sources aren't amazing but notability does look to be there. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:17, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mo Elleithee

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod removed by creator without comment. My concern is No indication of notability. He is merely someone working on a political campaign. Not notable Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 08:28, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 08:28, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 08:28, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 08:28, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Clearly not yet independently notable and all my searches of course found links but simply not for amply better improvement. SwisterTwister talk 08:28, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- clearly many in-depth stories about him that establish notability including from (just the first couple pages) the Washingtonian [1], Roll Call [2], Politico [3], The Hill [4], NYT [5], BuzzFeed [6], and literally dozens of others. He discussed at length in a number of books including (from my memory) Game Change and some of Larry Sabato's books on the 2008, 2010 and 2012 elections. This article needs to be expanded upon, yes, but there are clearly many sources available to do so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dcpoliticaljunkie (talk • contribs) 13:31, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:52, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per User:Dcpoliticaljunkie's persuasive sources. And a WP:TROUT to Nom for skipping WP:BEFORE.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:40, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.