Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ModPro Hackers The Movie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:49, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ModPro Hackers The Movie

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about an unreleased film, written by its producer, director, writer and star Aanish Ayaz (talk · contribs). The film "is being made by a Team which has never ever done anything related to Film making", and is not due for release until 2017. There is an IMDb entry, a 50-second Youtube "leak" uploaded by Ayaz, and all the usual social media, Facebook, Twitter etc; but no significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to indicate that this is anywhere near the standard of WP:NFILM. Contested PROD. JohnCD (talk) 18:33, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. JohnCD (talk) 18:35, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. JohnCD (talk) 18:35, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

year/type:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

filmmaker:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

studio:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:INDAFD: ModPro Hackers Muhammad Aanish Ayaz Muhammad Hussain Zafar M.A.A.F Productions

Delete this article as failing WP:NF and (at kindest) being far TOO SOON. I gave this thing a face-lift per MOS:FILM, but it lacks sourcability and needs to be deleted. Allow a return only when or if it gets proper coverage. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 02:21, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete Absolutely nothing showing why it's notable, no reliable sources as well. I'd almost say this could fall under CSD A7. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:00, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as clearly too soon. SwisterTwister talk 05:52, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.