Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modern Logistics
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:39, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
- Modern Logistics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Was dePRODed without addressing the issue. Concern was: Start up company. No claims to importance or significance. Fails to meet notability for airlines per WP:NTRAN Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:00, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 12:21, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 12:21, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 12:21, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fails GNG/CORPDEPTH. I found another company with a similar name that seemed notable, but it seems like a different one. It merged with another airline in China? South Nashua (talk) 20:13, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep As this is a Translation of main Article in Portuguese https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_Logistics, seems an important emergent Cargo Company in country. To remember, there are lot of aviation articles with just 1 airplane --92.76.86.106 (talk) 18:40, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as a non-notable small cargo company. Also appears promotional in nature. Shelbystripes (talk) 05:03, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as spam from anything but corporate spam. Hey you, yeah you! (talk) 07:26, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.