Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modulus Global

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jujutacular (talk) 22:30, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Modulus Global (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability, sources are almost exclusively primary, with no significant third-party coverage. Was prodded, prod removed by author without improvement. Content is unduly promotional. Huon (talk) 18:56, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 20:42, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:10, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:10, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as aside from some News and browser links, there's not much. SwisterTwister talk 07:10, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - There are a ton of press releases but nothing I see in depth. In fact, there is very little coverage at all. Fails WP:GNG. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:16, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Not enough independent coverage to show they pass either WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:09, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.