Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mogul lamp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. NOTCLEANUP applies for the nomination. In absence of any argument supporting deletion, closing this as keep. (non-admin closure) Yash! 02:30, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mogul lamp

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has been tagged for not having any references for the past 6 years. I was able to find a couple of uses of "mogul lamp" in this context:

The first one is a blog, and thus completely unworthy of WP:RS. The second one (paxton hardware) seems a bit more reliable, but still not what I'd like to see for a well-sourced article. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:52, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:53, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:58, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep AFD is not an article improvement service. The mogul base is a size of Edison standard light fitting and so this style of lamp is presumably a typical usage in the USA. Sources such as Applied Illumination Engineering seem easy to find. Andrew D. (talk) 12:04, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. As Andrew Davidson points out, this is a standard sort of thing and AfD is not for cleanup of surmountable problems. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:05, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.