Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Mahtab Alam
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 01:29, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Mohammad Mahtab Alam
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mohammad Mahtab Alam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This Article fails GNG. and Doesn't appear to have WP:SIGCOV. Iamfarzan (talk) 00:24, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Iamfarzan (talk) 00:24, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Iamfarzan (talk) 00:24, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- leaning toward delete - When I reviewed this, I saw some coverage and was on the fence about notability. On second look, it appears the yahoo news source is not neutral, leaving outlook india to be the only source offering any in-depth coverage. This is compounded by the fact that there appears to be a doctor with the same name. Unless more in-depth sources can be found, this does not appear to meet WP:GNG. A S U K I T E 16:01, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. A S U K I T E 16:13, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. A S U K I T E 16:13, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- he is not a doctor. He got the Doctorate(Phd). Iamfarzan (talk) 00:53, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete I cleaned up the article and there's nothing that helps in establishing notability, if we try for WP:NPOL, because it fails GNG at the first instance. Weird advert piece. ─ The Aafī (talk) 14:45, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.