Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Shoaib

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:47, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mohammed Shoaib (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL. Taabii (talk) 05:54, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, India, and Rajasthan. Taabii (talk) 05:54, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:NPOL as the subject has not been elected and has insufficient coverage by independent, reliable secondary sources to pass WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:09, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Commment @Taabii: not satisfying NPOL is not grounds for deletion, I ask you not to continue nominating articles for deletion under this claim. A WP:BEFORE is necessary that, as Pharaoh of the Wizards asserts, addresses the GNG criteria (not the NPOL criteria). Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 22:46, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  @Goldsztajn I'll follow your suggestions. Thank you. Taabii (talk) 01:41, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.