Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohan Rathod

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 03:46, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mohan Rathod (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found nothing substantial about the subject. He fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 16:58, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 16:59, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 16:59, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 16:59, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 16:59, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and I myself was going to nominate, nothing at all actually convincing for independent notability, a few local news aren't enough for convincingly better. SwisterTwister talk 19:51, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wow...A little WP:BEFORE gives us WP:INDAFD and its results for Mohan Rathod

@Johnpacklambert: what other credible source is there aside this one that clearly indicated it was copied from a blog?

• Keep per sourcability showing he meets WP:BASIC for a suitable stub that may grow over time and with regular editing through WP:WIP and WP:IMPERFECT. And what is perhaps missed is that WP:BIO specifically states"People who meet the basic criteria may be considered notable without meeting the additional criteria". Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 20:05, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

a phrase from your quote reads "may be considered". The subject is obviously WP:TOOSOON. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 21:33, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes... per guideline "may be considered". And like it or not, I "obviously" prefer to base an opinion on policy and applicable guideline (which over-rule consideration of SNG's only) and not upon a personal opinion nor helpful essays. But since I wrote it, I point you to the (perhaps missed) clarification at WP:TOOSOON#Biography notability basics that addresses how the essay TOO SOON is not always applicable, as the instructions of WP:BASIC are quite clear and a sourced stub article does not have to be immediately perfect. Thanks. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 10:36, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• The article was already deleted once; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohan Rathore. — Diannaa (talk) 22:45, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Under a different name, and that was then and this is now and please, WP:BASIC does not require any of the many supportive critera be also met. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 16:26, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to India's Raw Star as is normally done for such contestants. Only this not directly related is a small PR piece reproduced from an industry blog. Not good enough. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:41, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:24, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.