Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moira Fitzpatrick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 00:15, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Moira Fitzpatrick

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:BIO. I think it is irresponsible for Wikipedia to have a WP:BLP on this subject since there isn't really much to go on by way of reliable independent sources we would need to write a biography on a naturopath. Ireneshih (talk) 06:48, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 07:55, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 07:55, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom and fails WP:GNG as well. Reads like an WP:AUTOBIO. FuriouslySerene (talk) 14:34, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:52, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Besides the lack of evidence of notability, this reads like it's aimed less at describing the life and accomplishments of someone and more at promoting business at their practice. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:25, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per the notability issues referenced above. It's worth noting that the issues with the promotional natural of the article and its lack of encyclopedic tone are not in themselves deletion rationale (as such matter cans be fixed in instances where a subject is notable). But in any event, neither WP:GNG nor WP:BIO are satisfied here. Snow ^{let's rap} 05:23, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.