Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mojo Mendiola

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:52, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mojo Mendiola (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

notability? appears self-published, no independent sources Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 18:21, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:59, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:59, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:59, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:00, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:00, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:00, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Can't find any sources that aren't art(ist) directory-type sites. No references, some or the "external links" don't have coverage on him, http://www.detroitmona.com just has a blank page for him. German wiki article has no references either. Vrac (talk) 20:54, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Please, keep in mind, that directory-type sites are not necessarily freely accessible to anyone, in many cases approval is needed before registration goes into effect.

Please, take into consideration that most artist pages in MONA website are blank yet, due to a shortcoming of the MONA website management. Please, see newly added links to The International Society of Assemblage and Collage Artists, where Mendiola is a registered full member, and to ars mundi, a renowned German mail order art business, which recently has added Mendiola to their catalogue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Budybla23 (talk • contribs) 08:18, 9 December 2014 (UTC) Oh yes, I'm sorry about forgetting the signatureBudybla23 (talk) 22:03, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Does not appear as notable via art sources. The latest book is held at all of 3 libraries (2 in the US) in WorldCat; although I also found a copy in a German library catalog. No listings in NYTimes or New Yorker, in spite of NY exhibits. LaMona (talk) 21:16, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Comment: Especially in NYC I bet more exhibitions (especially first exhibitions in the city) go unmentioned in the NYT and the 'New Yorker' than get mentioned. And after all: If one person comes up with a press clip from a NY paper or magazine, another person could say: 'Delete, because no US press coverage outside NYC', and so on. This is a good method to campaign but doesn't reveal much about the person in question, whoever this may be.Budybla23 (talk) 10:17, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not !vote multiple times. Vrac (talk) 14:23, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Does not meet GNG, just being a competent professional is not sufficient to meet GNG. When this article was created 10 years ago, notability standards were still in flux.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 00:22, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.