Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molpay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 02:55, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Molpay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is created to promote itself. questionable coverage and references. nothing like an encyclopedic notable. Article is just detail press comprise into an short article. Even added their booklet. Light2021 (talk) 19:53, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as this was somehow "reviewed and accepted" last year and tagged but it should've in fact been nominated for deletion as a skillfully informed user aware of advertising would, because that's especially what all of this is and there's nothing to suggest anything otherwise, since the information and sources are still in fact advertising overall

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:45, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:45, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as corporate spam with no indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:23, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.