Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monica Sweet (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:39, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Monica Sweet

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No qualifying awards or nonpromotional nominations. No reliably sourced biographical content. No independent sourcing The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 17:06, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No real claim of passing the current PORNBIO guideline. No reliable source coverage. Claims of passing an earlier version of PORNBIO as a Hustler Honey did not save the article in 2007 and the guideline has been significantly tightened since then. • Gene93k (talk) 23:38, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: a BLP with no reliable sources listed; no indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:53, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable with no RS citing. Kierzek (talk) 03:01, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I made a good faith search for any sort of coverage in reliable sources and discovered nothing. Accordingly, I concur with the nominator's analysis. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 05:03, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as no evidence of notability, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 15:20, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable pronographic actress.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:55, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.