Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MonoMetro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Joe (talk) 22:10, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MonoMetro

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet notability guidelines, no indication that this company has progressed beyond the concept phase in 20+ years. –dlthewave ☎ 17:38, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 18:02, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 18:02, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not, or certainly no longer, notable --papageno (talk) 04:33, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 09:02, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not enough RS doesn't meet WP:not. Deathlibrarian (talk) 12:19, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Dial911 (talk) 16:22, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No evidence of notability. \\\Septrillion:- ~~‭~~10^Eleventeen 20:16, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.