Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monument Policy Group (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:04, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Monument Policy Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page was clearly deleted in 2008. It still has no sourcing that establishes notability. The article, as well as articles on the group's members were alomst certainly created by a PR firm. GPL93 (talk) 18:38, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:47, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:48, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. GPL93 (talk) 13:56, 22 April 2019 (UTC) [reply]

• Delete Per WP:NOPROMO. The organization does not appear to pass WP:GNG either despite listing some impressive sounding clients/connections. It's not the purpose of Wikipedia to promote organizations for private financial gain. Newshunter12 (talk) 02:50, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.