Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moshe Begim

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. AustralianRupert (talk) 09:56, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moshe Begim

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a poorly sourced attack ad. It boils down to "this guy was head of a company and accused of money laundering." It is riddled with "citation needed" links, and is written as an attack. Its presence in Wikipedia adds nothing, especially since the claim of conviction is to a non-working link that looks to not be a reliable source. John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:09, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Johnpacklambert is 100% correct in this matter, and he knows that I do not hestitate to disagree with him. I did a good faith Google search and found no evidence of notability. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:20, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:32, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:32, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:32, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:32, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- not something one would expect to find in an encyclopedia; a strange mix of "crime blotter" and WP:PROMO. No reliable sources to be found. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:01, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Nick-D (talk) 01:13, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:20, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.