Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mountain fennec

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 22:00, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mountain fennec

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Could not find any reliable-source coverage; the only citations in the article were unverified "personal communication" with a biologist and a personal blog which was copied from the Wikipedia article. –dlthewave ☎ 19:40, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:53, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 00:19, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Literally nothing to see here. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 00:25, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lots of cyptozoology mentions saying it's a maybe. Nothing to see...move along please. Non-notable non-species. It can always be recreated if somebody proves something in the future and gives it the same "common name". (Don't get me started on common names for rare things!) Nick Moyes (talk) 01:08, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - unverifiable, made up in a day, and original research. Closing admin has cover from me to salt this stupid page. Bearian (talk) 20:33, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not much more to add.Slatersteven (talk) 14:51, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is a Dr. K. de Smet, coauthor for a few works and doctoral thesis on distribution of mammals in Algeria[1] cited a bit. Can't find that he published on the critter tho.—eric 15:27, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to lack of reliable sources.-Roxy, the PROD. . wooF 16:16, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to lack of reliable sources. :bloodofox: (talk) 19:12, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.