Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mouse Mischief

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 06:54, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mouse Mischief (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:NPRODUCT and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:10, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products, Education, and Software. UtherSRG (talk) 17:10, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. There is no indication that this relatively minor feature is notable independently from its parent programme. Actualcpscm ^{scrutinize, talk} 20:51, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.