Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Movement for Quality Government in Israel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Deletion would not be the solution for uncited information being added, at most I would suggest requesting it be put under page protection if the situation gets bad enough, (non-admin closure) Shadow311 (talk) 18:05, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Movement for Quality Government in Israel

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I hate to nominate this for deletion as it is undoubtedly a notable group, but this page seems to be getting more and more uncited information added to it. I propose a the mainspace article for this to be deleted (WP:TNT) with the current page draftified. Thoughts? GnocchiFan (talk) 17:02, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Israel. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:54, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:47, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Just to make it clear – there are reliable sources which discuss this group in depth. I think some of the sources used in the Hebrew Wikipedia could also be used here too. But as I say, the whole article is currently unsourced and would benefit from draftifying at this stage. GnocchiFan (talk) 18:01, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've reverted the article to the version immediately prior to when Resignation793 started replacing cited information with uncited info, and also their undiscussed move of the article to draftspace. --Finngall ^talk 19:09, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This article should have appeared in sandbox while I was/am in the process of writing it. I am quite new to Wikipedia and forgot about that option. I am trying to move the article to my sandbox now, but so far haven't succeeded. Resignation793 (talk) 19:15, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Clearly notable organisation regularly mentioned and cited in the press (both for criticism of politicians and its awards); AfD is not cleanup; the article seems to have been stripped back to some referenced basics and shouldn't be an issue to have in mainspace. I have expanded it a little more and added numerous references. Number 5 7 20:08, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per @Number 57. Subject is notable and article is by no means "irreparable," as required for WP:TNT. Eelipe (talk) 02:26, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: There are a lot of literature that satisfies the GNG. If we are worried about vandalism, locking the page is a viable option. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 08:02, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The subject easily passes NORG. The nominator doesn't claim otherwise yet wants to delete by TNT, which isn't justified for this article. gidonb (talk) 02:42, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.