Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muamlaatism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 21:11, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Muamlaatism

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All sources provided in this article point back to the writings of Sheikh Umar Vadillo, who's article was created by the same author who created Muamlaatism. A google search provides no further English language sources. Looks like a neologism created by Vadillo to describe his ideas in that light, rather than a notable economic theory and the article might well be a candidate for merge or deletion. Dolescum (talk) 09:12, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article claims it's the economic system of Islam, but that only seems to be the claim of Umar Vadillo. Since the sources don't really support Vadillo's neologism, not even a merge seems possible. MezzoMezzo (talk) 06:55, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a complete mess. Much of this is mere word salad. How is capitalism like socialism like this theory? Bearian (talk) 20:38, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.