Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mud Duck Productions
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete and redirect to ZeniMax Media. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:31, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- Mud Duck Productions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Completely unsourced for over 2 years. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 18:10, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete These are all reliable sources I could quickly find that mention the topic in-text: [1][2][3][4]. While the first offers minimal information directly about the company/label, the article overall easily fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:CORPDEPTH. Lordtobi (✉) 18:32, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:51, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:51, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect to ZeniMax Media as a bargain-bin seller of low-notice games. Nate • (chatter) 01:39, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect – I actually first created this page as a redirect to ZeniMax, it's not really notable on its own. Ausir (talk) 01:50, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.