Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Farooq Rehmani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 00:37, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Farooq Rehmani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about biography without any significant citations. Looks Autobiography. GreenCricket (talk) 13:09, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete certainly as nothing suggesting the needed improvements which this seriously needs, nothing else convincing. SwisterTwister talk 22:45, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 04:01, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 04:01, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Looking down the given references and seeing an assortment of Scribd, Blogspot, Wordpress etc., I was heading towards a Delete opinion. But then there is the Simon Tisdall piece from the Guardian, worth quoting: "Muhammad Farooq Rehmani, chairman of the Jammu and Kashmir People's Freedom League and former convenor of the All Parties Hurriyat Conference opposition coalition, bears eloquent witness to the invidious consequences of such neglect. A journalist, author and political activist, he has spent nearly 10 years in jail, on and off, since first being arrested by Indian security forces in 1968." Perhaps this is needing tidying and better sourcing. AllyD (talk) 18:34, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.