Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Qasim Sadiq (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 21:03, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Qasim Sadiq (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article currently has two sources, one of which is a dead link and the other isn't verified. BEFORE hasn't turned up anything, though sources may be available in other languages. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:49, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Islam, and Pakistan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:16, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Keep I am surprised that even after the first deletion discussions which closed as Keep it was again tagged for deletion discussion. These are some references I would like to mention: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9] Kkb091 (talk) 09:58, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• KEEP Seems to me Kkb091 has provided many additional sources shown above. Also, today I looked and saw that he has worked on the article and further improved it, so there are no lack of sources any more at the article for notability. This Sufi sheikh (1845 - 1942) has a large number of followers in Pakistan. Ngrewal1 (talk) 16:41, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.