Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhimmath

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Mojo Hand (talk) 14:46, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Muhimmath (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed draftification, albeit a few months ago. This is a WP:ROTM charity, albeit performing a useful role. Nothing about it is shown to pass WP:CORP. WIkipedia is not a directory of charities, however useful they are. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:29, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Education, and Kerala. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:29, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: Two editors have stated the opinion on the creating editor's user talk page that this is likely to be UPE. @Zoglophie and DoubleGrazing: you may wish to offer a contribution to this discussion. I am not seeking to influence the type of contribution you may choose to make. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:30, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete : looks like the author waited for the dust to settle down before sneaking into disruptively publishing the page into mainspace yet again with long standing COI concerns all littered over in his talk page. I think all his edits need to be examined at ANI. zoglophie^•talk• 14:47, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No evidence of notability, should never have left the draft space (and that's before even considering the COI/UPE issue). --DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:37, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Islam. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:14, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - This article says that the organization exists. That does not make it organizationally notable. The article does not speak for itself and does not describe what third parties have said about the organization. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:06, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.