Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mukul Sharma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Carry on with other works people. WP:Non-admin closure §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 03:57, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mukul Sharma

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mukul Sharma has no notability and by WP:Notability, this article can be deleted. - Vatsan34 (talk) 14:25, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:02, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:02, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:NACADEMICS for being the holder of a named chair "W. A. “Tex” Moncrief, Jr. Centennial Chair in Petroleum Engineering" (ref) §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 19:39, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep I refer the nom to WP:PROF (and also WP:BEFORE) and recommend to study it before doing further nominations in this field. The nomination statement is very weak, too. In any case, Sharma holds a named chair at UT (as the article states and easily verifiable through the external link provided), which is a clear pass of WP:ACADEMIC#5. --Randykitty (talk) 19:42, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:NACADEMICS, point #5. The subject holds a named chair at the University of Texas at Austin. Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:16, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The pass of WP:PROF#C5 is definitive and clear enough, but he also passes #1 through high citations demonstrated e.g. in his Google scholar profile [1]. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:35, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep. Endowed chair conclusively passes WP:PROF. Because "keep" is inevitable, can I make a friendly suggestion for nom to withdraw this AfD? Agricola44 (talk) 20:36, 2 February 2014 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.